Have Trunk Will Travel: The Elephant Company

Have Trunk Will Travel: The Elephant Company

The point of this blog is to give a two-sided perspective of animals kept in captivity. One of the most notorious companies in the animal rights groups perspective is the company Have Trunk Will Travel, Inc. Have Trunk Will Travel, Inc. is currently based in Perris, California and houses five adult female Asian elephants at its ranch. The company also owns elephants on loan at the Oregon Zoo and Houston Zoo. The company rents elephants for movies, most notably for providing elephants for the movies Water for Elephants, Zookeeper, and George of the Jungle. Have Trunk Will Travel has also provided elephants for the music video "Circus". The company generates its revenue through elephant rentals, mainly through movies, but also with rides and special events. The company is run by the couple Gary and Kari Johnson, a legendary elephant training couple.

 

In 2011, the radical animal rights group In Defense of Animals, released a video of elephant abuse at Have Trunk Will Travel. Circling around YouTube, many people were horrified with what appeared to be severe beatings with bullhooks and electric shocks. A baby elephant was being pulled by its trunk. Several females are seen to being poked with bullhooks in order to perform behaviors. Groans are heard from the elephants. All in all, the video is an example of human exploitation of animals, at least, on the surface...


In Defense of Animals have continually lobbied to close down HTWT. In Defense of Animals claims that all the elephants at HTWT have been continually abused and should be set free in an animal sanctuary. According to the PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) website,
"HTWT has a long history of exploiting elephants. It uses elephants who as babies were captured in the wild and subjected to intense beatings to break their spirits. In their natural environment, the elephants would walk up to 30 miles per day with their families, but at HTWT, they are chained in place by one front foot and one back foot all night, every night, and for more than half of every day during the winter months.
In addition to abusing their own elephants, the owners of HTWT, Kari and Gary Johnson, have repeatedly opposed legislation to protect elephants. In comments concerning federal policy changes regarding training and handling practices for elephants, HTWT defended the use of cruel electric prods and bullhooks on elephants."


Things haven't gone so well for HTWT since the release of the video. In Defense of Animals timed the release of the video perfectly, at the premiere of Water for Elephants, in which Have Trunk Will Travel's matriarch Tai, was the star. Ironically, in the movie, Tai's character is beaten by circus handlers. The movie's director maintains that the groans of pain were prerecorded and no animals were harmed in the movie. However, HTWT has had a lot of fallbacks in the last couple years. The Santa Anna Zoo stopped the elephant rides that HTWT provided and the San Diego Country Fair banned the elephant rides as well.


However, let's look at it from Have Trunk Will Travel's side and their founders Gary and Kari Johnson. They have been taking care of elephants for four decades, in which only in the last decade, have they become under scrutiny for their elephant care. Why? Animal rights purposely put the Johnsons into the public spotlight in order to serve their cause. In Defense of Animals actually filmed the video of abuse in 2005, but released it another six years later, coincidentally at the premiere of Water for Elephants. If the elephants were being abused, why didn't In Defense of Animals release it in 2005? IDA most likely saw the video as a source to squirrel away until the moment was right.

In a recent email to HTWT, Kari Johnson responded to the elephant abuse video with the following statement:
"We are certified members of the AZA Species Survival Plan, and serve on the California State Fish and Game Animal Welfare Advisory Committee. We have served as members of the animal welfare committees for the Western Fairs Association, the Outdoor Amusement Business Association, have been presented with the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Elephant Managers Association, and are founding members of the International Elephant Foundation.  Our elephants participate in research projects to advance elephant health and breeding programs to ensure the survival of this endangered species.  We work with and for elephants.

We provide the public with up close, tactile access to elephants.  100% privately funded, revenue from our events help fund the ranch and everything we do with our elephants including conservation, breeding programs increasing Asian elephant awareness and health research.  To date, we have succeeded in producing six elephant calves.  We are raising funds for, and contributing to, the species’ survival.  We are dedicated to the enhancement and survival of elephants."  

It's hard to say, but after closely examining the elephant abuse video, there appears to be no real permanent damage to the elephants nor excessive beatings. Unlike some Ringling Bros. abuse videos, HTWT's "abuse" sometimes appears to be nothing more than a gentle poke. And with an elephant's thick skin, it's hard to imagine that there would be any real harm. HTWT also stated

"It's worth noting that the animal rights extremists have no professional expertise in the area of elephant care and training - they have only opinion (which they are certainly entitled to).  However, the USDA (the government body charged with oversight) did not lend the video any credibility at all.  The AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums), of which HTWT is a voluntary member, did exhaustive investigations based on the video and inflammatory allegations and found no evidence of abuse or cruelty.  Their claims simply do not hold up under closer - and unprejudiced - inspection by experts. Experts in both elephant care and video production point out the sloppy, dishonest characterizations used in the video."

So what's the final verdict? It's hard to say, as both sides have equal evidence. HTWT is guilty of using bullhooks, chains, and otherwise, abusing its elephants. However, there is no evidence to suggest HTWT does it regularly. The video shows only snippets of "abuse" and does not immediately conclude that HTWT beats its elephants regularly. It also shows that if HTWT was abusing its elephants, why were there no accidents? Generally, when elephant handlers beat their charges, elephants have a history of lashing back and killing their trainers. HTWT has no recorded accidents or deaths, quite an accomplishment for an occupation that was ranked three times more deadlier than coal mining. In the end, Have Trunk Will Travel will most likely continue, serving in its mission to educate the public with rides and shows. PETA and IDA will continue to hammer away at the company, hurling accusations and mud. Both have legitimate concerns and arguments. Unless Have Trunk Will Travel does something outrageously cruel, they will most likely continue.

Bryan's opinion: I do not believe that HTWT is a terrible organization designed to exploit and beat these majestic animals. I also do not believe that they use positive reinforcement all the time, hence, the video. However, it is plausible that HTWT loves and cares for their elephants deeply. They have an excellent track record when it comes to elephant lifespans, with three of their elephants already in their mid-forties. I believe they have made some mistakes, as people have, and I do not condone with the use of bullhooks or electric prods. However, if they continue to care for their elephants greatly and provide an enriching and comfortable home for their five elephants, then HTWT has my approval (although they don't needs it).

Links:
HTWT abuse video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50wBdPhBQGo
HTWT training:  http://www.youtube.com/user/ElephantAmbassadors?feature=watch




 

Zoological Parks: The Truth and Lies of the history and futures of zoos

The History and Future of Zoos



Most people in the United States love zoos. According to the Association of Zoos & Aquariums, over 175 million people visit zoos each year, more than professional football and basketball game attendance combined. 9.4 million households have memberships with AZA facilities, while 93% agree their family enjoys seeing animals up close at zoos and aquariums. Zoos have transformed themselves into conservation organizations, individual Noah's arks, contributing to save thousands of species of flora and fauna. Zoo exhibits resemble the African savanna, polar ice caps, and tropical rainforests. Zoos have become the all-American experience, and yet, animal rights groups condemn zoos for exploiting animals for profit.

 

The world has changed a lot since the first zoological parks popped up. Before zoos, came the private menageries. In ancient times, exotic animals were a symbol of power and wealth. Rulers would exhibit their lions, tigers, elephants, and baboons to symbolize how they could exploit beautiful animals. Ancient Egyptians were the first animal trainers, using armies of baboons to do household chores and leashed cheetahs to hunt. Ancient Romans loved gruesome spectacles of exotic animals killing each other or humans, with elephant stampedes and big cat mauls. Until the 19th century, scientific research or conservation was unheard of, as exotic animals were still plentiful.

Next came the age of roadside menageries. All over the United States, for-profit menageries popped up, exhibiting big cats, elephants, hippos, primates, and exotic birds for cheap amusement. The animals were often put in dreadful conditions, usually tiny concrete cages with no regards to . However, this was also the age in which people began to take interest in zoology. Several zoos were built, such as the London Zoo and Dublin Zoo, aimed to exhibit animals in better conditions. The London Zoo later became known as the world's oldest scientific zoo.

In the beginning of the 20th century, it was still clear that awful conditions for animals was the norm, rather than the exception. More American zoos, such as the San Diego Zoo, had switched to open-air enclosures, rather than concrete cages with metal bars. Even today, certain zoos suffer from cages and a lack of care for the animals. After World War II, zoos went through a drastic change, and by the 1980s and 1990s, most zoos had become legitimate conservation organizations, dedicated to wildlife research and education. However, zoos are still plagued with problems from an ever-demanding public, shrinking funds, wars with the animal rights groups, multiple international laws on endangered species retrieval and a shrinking wild population of animals.

 

Contemporary Zoos:

 

 

Zoos have now realized that the ethics of keeping exotic animals in captivity is difficult and now work to save animals. The animals kept in zoos are generally given large, spacious enclosures and have specific diets and enrichment to keep them from getting bored. Zoos often pour millions of dollars into new exhibits, geared for the education of the public and research for scientists. Zoos often host researchers who can learn more from a controlled setting than the wild. However, it is still important to note that zoos have a ways to go in some aspects. Many zoos provide inadequate care for their animals, such as elephants or dolphins, as it is hard to study these animals and their natural behavior. Zoos have also been accused of capitalizing on flagship species, such as tigers, polar bears, and elephants. In short, there are multiple zoos with problems with their animal care or infrastructure.


Future of zoos: Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and they are unlikely to end any time soon, with record revenues. About twenty AZA facilities in the United States host more than a million people annually, with many more fast approaching the 1 million mark. However, as Earth's species continue to disappear, it is looked to zoos to save these species. It is true that zoos have had some degree of success in saving species, such as the golden lion tamarins or Arabian oryx. But it is ultimately up to the countries which house the animals to save the species. Zoos do not have the resources to save even 2% of all species in the world. But many valiantly try to, spreading knowledge, and trying to educate the public. Zoos are not perfect, and many have multiple problems. But they can serve as valuable fountains of knowledge, research, and inspiration. In the end, zoos will not have the final say, but they can definitely contribute.